Small behavioral science–informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects

by Robert B. Cialdini, Steve J. Martin, & Noah J. Goldstein
February 15, 2017

Author Affiliation

Cialdini, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University; Martin, Influence At Work UK; Goldstein, Anderson School of Management, UCLA. Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]


1.Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 106–116.

2.Leshner, G., Bolls, P., & Thomas, E. (2009). Scare ’em or disgust ’em: The effects of graphic health promotion messages. Health Communication, 24, 447–458.

3.Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 5–16.

4.Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003, November 21). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.

5.Madrian, B., & Shea, D. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 1149–1188.

6.Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

7.Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

8.Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

9.Goldstein, N. J., Martin, S. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Yes! 50 scientifically proven ways to be persuasive. New York, NY: Free Press.

10. Martin, S. J, Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2014). The small big: Small changes that spark big influence. New York, NY: Hachette.

11. Nolan, J. P., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923.

12. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

13. Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.

14. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper.

15. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

16. Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915–927.

17. Wooten, D. B., & Reed, A. (1998). Informational influence and the ambiguity of product experience: Order effects in the weighting of evidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 79–99.

18. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

19. Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review, 112, 494–508.

20. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517–539.

21. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor.

22. Claidière, N., & Whiten, A. (2012). Integrating the study of conformity and culture in humans and nonhuman animals. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 126–145.

23. Martin, S. (2012, October). 98% of HBR readers love this article. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 23–25.

24. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

25. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.

26. McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

27. Pfeffer, J., Fong, C. T., Cialdini, R. B., & Portnoy, R. R. (2006). Why use an agent in transactions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1362–1374.

28. Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014). The wisdom of select crowds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 276–299.

29. Mason, M. F., Lee, A. J., Wiley, E. A., & Ames, D. R. (2013). Precise offers are potent anchors: Conciliatory counteroffers and attributions of knowledge in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 759–763.

30. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

31. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

32. Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593–623.

33. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.

34. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.

35. Tajfel, H. (1970, November). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102.

36. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

37. Levine, M., Prosser, A., & Evans, D. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443–453.

38. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003, October 10). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.

39. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

40. Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The trans-situational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112.

41. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2013). The importance of demonstratively restoring order. PLoS One, 8(6), Article e65137.

42. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

43. Whatley, M. A., Webster, J. M., Smith, R. H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251–259.

44. Goldstein, N. J., Griskevicius, V., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Reciprocity by proxy: A novel influence strategy for stimulating cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 441–473.

45. Kleine, R. E., III, Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social-identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 209–235.

46. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

47. Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: An integrative review. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 55–85). New York, NY: Springer.

48. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.

49. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

50. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336.

51. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.

52. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181–227.

53. Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318–328.

54. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

55. Martin, S. J., Bassi, S., & Dunbar-Rees, R. (2012). Commitments, norms and custard creams—A social influence approach to reducing did not attends (DNAs). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105, 101–104.

56. Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 133–147.

57. Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). It’s not all about me: Motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psychological Science, 22, 1494–1499.

58. Marsh, K. L., & Webb, W. M. (1996). Mood uncertainty and social comparison: Implications for mood management. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 1–26.

59. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255–275.

60. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.