Improving voting systems’ user-friendliness, reliability, & security

by Michael D. Byrne
August 14, 2017

Supplemental Material

Author Affiliation

Byrne: Rice University. Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected].


1. Cooper, B., Cox, D., Lienesch, R., &
Jones, R. P. (2016). The divide over
America’s future: 1950 or 2050? Findings
from the 2016 American Values Survey
[Research report]. Retrieved from PPRI
2. Davidson, A. (2016, November 28). The
recount road to nowhere. New Yorker.
Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.
3. Herrnson, P. S., Niemi, R. G., Hanmer,
M. J., Bederson, B. B., Conrad, F.
C., & Traugott, M. W. (2008). Voting
technology: The not-so-simple act
of casting a ballot. Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press.
4. California Secretary of State. (2007).
Top-to-bottom review. Retrieved
5. Laskowski, S. J., Autry, M., Cugini, J.,
Killam, W., & Yen, J. (2004). Improving
the usability and accessibility of voting
systems and products (NIST Special
Publication 500-256). Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. International Committee for Information
Technology Standards. (1998). ISO 9241-
11:1998. Ergonomic requirements for
office work with visual display terminals
(VDT)s—Part 11: Guidance on usability.
Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
7. Greene, K. K., Byrne, M. D., & Everett,
S. P. (2006). A comparison of
usability between voting methods.
In Proceedings of the 2006 USENIX/
ACCURATE Electronic Voting
Technology Workshop. Retrieved from
8. Byrne, M. D., Greene, K. K., & Everett,
S. P. (2007). Usability of voting systems:
Baseline data for paper, punch cards,
and lever machines. In Proceedings
of the SIGCHI Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems: CHI
2007 (pp. 171–180). New York, NY:
Association for Computing Machinery.
9. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and
dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B.
Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L.
McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in
industry (pp. 189–194). London, United
Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
10. Runyan, N. H. (2007). Improving access
to voting: A report on the technology
for accessible voting systems.
Retrieved from Dēmos website: http://
11. United States Election Assistance
Commission. (2005). Voluntary voting
system guidelines. Retrieved from
12. Everett, S. P., Greene, K. K., Byrne, M.
D., Wallach, D. S., Derr, K., Sandler,
D., & Torous, T. (2008). Electronic
voting machines versus traditional
methods: Improved preference,
similar performance. In Proceedings
of the SIGCHI Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems: CHI
2008 (pp. 883–892). New York, NY:
Association for Computing Machinery.
13. Everett, S. P. (2007). The usability of
electronic voting machines and how
votes can be changed without detection
(Doctoral dissertation). Rice University,
Houston, TX.
14. Mercuri, R. T. (2005). Physical verifiability
of computer systems. Retrieved from
15. Campbell, B. A., & Byrne, M. D. (2009).
Now do voters notice review screen
anomalies? A look at voting system
usability. In Proceedings of the 2009
USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting
Technology Workshop/Workshop on
Trustworthy Elections. Retrieved from
16. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
(2001). Residual votes attributable to
technology: An assessment of the
reliability of existing voting equipment
[Report, Version 2]. Retrieved from
17. Bell, S., Benaloh, J., Byrne, M. D.,
DeBeauvior, D., Eakin, B., Fisher, G., . .
. Winn, M. (2013). STAR-Vote: A secure,
transparent, auditable, and reliable
voting system. Journal of Election
Technology and Systems, 1, 18–37