combating biased decisionmaking & promoting justice & equal treatment

by sunita sah, david tannenbaum, hayley cleary, yuval feldman, jack glaser, amy lerman, robert maccoun, edward maguire, paul slovic, barbara spellman, cassia spohn, christopher winship
May 24, 2017

Author Affiliation

Sah, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University; Tannenbaum, Eccles School of Business, University of Utah; Cleary, L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University; Feldman, Faculty of Law, Bar-Ilan University; Glaser, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley; Lerman, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley; MacCoun, Stanford Law School; Maguire, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University; Slovic, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon; Spellman, University of Virginia Law School; Spohn, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University; Winship, Department of Sociology, Harvard University. Corresponding author’s email: [email protected]cornell.edu

References

1. Glaser, J. (2015). Suspect race: Causes and consequences of racial profiling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

2. Jones-Brown, D., Gill, J., & Trone, J. (2010). Stop, question & frisk policing practices in New York City: A primer. New York, NY: John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Center on Race, Crime and Justice.

3. New York Civil Liberties Union. (2011). Stop-and-frisk 2011. New York, NY: Author.

4. Lerman, A., & Weaver, V. (2014). Arresting citizenship: The democratic consequences of American crime control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

5. Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

6. Bonczar, T. P. (2003). Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974–2001 (Special Report NCJ 197976). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

7. Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass incarceration. New York, NY: New Press.

8. Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996).

9. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

10. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

11. Ramirez, D. A., Hoopes, J., & Quinlan, T. L. (2003). Defining racial profiling in a post–September 11 world. American Criminal Law Review, 40, 1195–1233.

12. Chauhan, P., Warner, T. C., Fera, A. G., Balazon, E., Lu, O., & Welsh, M. (2015, December). Tracking enforcement rates in New York City, 2003–2014. Paper presented at the meeting of the Citizens Crime Commission, New York, NY.

13. Cohen, T. H. (2013). Pretrial detention and misconduct in federal district courts, 1995–2010 (Special Report NCJ 239673). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

14. Bridges, G. S. (1997). A study on racial and ethnic disparities in superior court bail and pre-trial detention practices in Washington. Olympia, WA: Washington State Minority and Justice Commission.

15. Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51, 222–242.

16. Spohn, C. (2009). Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: Indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review, 57, 879–902.

17. Kutataladze, B., Tymas, W., & Crowley, M. (2014). Race and prosecution in Manhattan. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.

18. Williams, P. (2016, August 19). Justice Department says poor can’t be held when they can’t afford bail. NBC News. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/justice-department-says-poor-can-t-be-held-when-they-n634676

19. Cohen, T. H., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2010). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2006 (Bulletin NCJ 228944). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

20. Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2011). The color of justice: Race, ethnicity and crime in America. Boston, MA: Cengage.

21. Mamalian, C. A. (2011). State of the science of pretrial risk assessment. Gaithersburg, MD: Pretrial Justice Institute.

22. Maguire, E. R., Lowrey, B., & Johnson, D. (2016). Evaluating the relative impact of positive and negative encounters with police: A randomized experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9276-9

23. Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 343–367.

24. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

25. Tyler, T., Goff, P., & MacCoun, R. (2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109.

26. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

27. Eller, A., Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Imara, D. A., & Peerbux, S. (2007). Stay cool, hang loose, admit nothing: Race, intergroup contact, and public-police relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 213–224.

28. President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

29. Shusta, R. M., Levine, D. R., Wong, H. Z., Olson, A. T., & Harris, P. R. (2015). Multicultural law enforcement: Strategies for peacekeeping in a diverse society (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

30. White, M. D., Cooper, J. A., Saunders, J., & Raganella, A. J. (2010). Motivations for becoming a police officer: Re-assessing officer attitudes and job satisfaction after six years on the street. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 520–530.

31. Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Eichelsheim, V. I., Van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 196–218.

32. Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 63–82.

33. Bierie, D. M. (2013). Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates (2000–2007). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 15–29.

34. Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2007). Procedural fairness: A key ingredient in public satisfaction. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44(1/2), 4–25.

35. Gover, A. R., Brank, E. M., & MacDonald, J. M. (2007). A specialized domestic violence court in South Carolina: An example of procedural justice for victims and defendants. Violence Against Women, 13, 603–626.

36. Johnson, D., Maguire, E. R., & Kuhns, J. B (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law and Society Review, 48, 947–978.

37. Lowrey, B. V., Maguire, E. R., & Bennett, R. R. (2016). Testing the effects of procedural justice and overaccommodation in traffic stops: A randomized experiment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1430–1449. doi:10.1177/0093854816639330

38. Evans, J. S. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology,59, 255–278.

39. Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal, 112, F480–F518.

40. Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 379–383.

41. Robertson, C. T., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2016). Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

42. MacCoun, R. J., & Perlmutter, S. (2015, October 7). Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth. Nature, 526, 187–189.

43. Godin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review, 90, 715–741.

44. Sah, S., Robertson, C. T., & Baughman, S. B (2015). Blinding prosecutors to defendants’ race: A policy proposal to reduce unconscious bias in the criminal justice system. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 69–76.

45. Feldman, Y., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2015). The human mind and human rights: A call for an integrative study of the mechanisms generating employment discrimination across different social categories. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 9, 43–67.

46. Slovic, P. (2015). When (in) action speaks louder than words: Confronting the collapse of humanitarian values in foreign policy decisions. Illinois Law Review Slip Opinions, 2015, 24–31.

47. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.

48. Brilliant, J. (2015, November 16). Gov. Pence suspends resettlement of Syrian refugees in Indiana. WTHR. http://www.wthr.com/article/gov-pence-suspends-resettlement-of-syrian-refugees-in-indiana

49. Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., & Ohlson, D. (2012). Structured decision making: A practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.