Bridging the divide between behavioral science & policy

by craig r. fox, sim b sitkin
February 15, 2017

Author Note

We thank Shlomo Benartzi, Robert Cialdini, Richard Larrick, and David Schkade for sharing details of their case studies with us and Carsten Erner for assistance in preparing this article. We also thank Carol Graham, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Todd Rogers, Denise Rousseau, Cass Sunstein, and David Tannenbaum for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author Affiliation

Fox, Anderson School of Management, Department of Psychology, and Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Sitkin, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]

References

1.Shepard, A. C. (2001, January/February). How they blew it. American Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.ajrarchive.org/

2.VanNatta, D., Jr., & Canedy, D. (2000, November 9). The 2000 elections: The Palm Beach ballot; Florida Democrats say ballot’s design hurt Gore. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

3.Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.

4.Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

5.Wand, J. N., Shotts, K. W., Sekhon, J. S., Mebane, W. R., Herron, M. C., & Brady, H. E. (2001). The butterfly did it: The aberrant vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida. American Political Science Review, 95, 793–810.

6.Anderson, J. R. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.

7.Abaluck, J., & Gruber, J. (2011). Choice inconsistencies among the elderly: Evidence from plan choice in the Medicare Part D program. American Economic Review, 101, 1180–1210.

8.Bhargava, S., Loewenstein, G., & Sydnor, J. (2015). Do individuals make sensible health insurance decisions? Evidence from a menu with dominated options (NBER Working Paper No. 21160). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w21160

9.Epley, N., & Gneezy, A. (2007). The framing of financial windfalls and implications for public policy. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 36–47.

10. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.

11. Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 35–51.

12. Schweitzer, M., Hershey, J. C., & Asch, D. A. (1996). Individual choice in spending accounts: Can we rely on employees to choose well? Medical Care, 34, 583–593.

13. Halpern, S. D., Loewenstein, G., Volpp, K. G., Cooney, E., Vranas, K., Quill, C.M., . . . Bryce, C. (2013). Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care. Health Affairs, 32, 408–417.

14. Gelman, A., & King, G. (1990). Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1142–1164.

15. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.

16. Moshinsky, A., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2010). Loss aversion and status quo label bias. Social Cognition, 28, 191–204.

17. Hershfield, H. E., Goldstein, D. G., Sharpe, W. F., Fox, J., Yeykelis, L., Carstensen, L.L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2011). Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), 23–37.

18. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

19. Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

20. Sunstein, C. R. (2012). If misfearing is the problem, is cost–benefit analysis the solution? In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 231–244). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

21. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

22. Shafir, E. (Ed.). (2012). The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

23. Oliver, A. (Ed.). (2013). Behavioural public policy. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

24. Rousseau, D. M. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

25. Johnson, E. J., Shu, S. B., Dellaert, B. G. C., Fox, C. R., Goldstein, D. G., Häubl, G., . . . Weber, E. U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487–504.

26. Salas, E., Klein, C., King, H., Salisbury, N., Augenstein, J. S., Birnbach, D. J., . . . Upshaw, C. (2008). Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34, 518–527.

27. Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857–871.

28. Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2011). Fuzzy math, disclosure regulation, and market outcomes: Evidence from truth-in-lending reform. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 506–534.

29. Downs, J. S., Wisdom, J., & Loewenstein, G. (in press). Helping consumers use nutrition information: Effects of format and presentation. American Journal of Health Economics.

30. Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

31. Hackmann, J. R. (2011). Collaborative intelligence: Using teams to solve hard problems. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

32. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

33. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1998). The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 291–330.

34. Tannenbaum, D., Doctor, J. N., Persell, S. D, Friedberg, M. W., Meeker, D., Friesema, E. M., . . . Fox, C. R. (2015). Nudging physician prescription decisions by partitioning the order set: Results of a vignette-based study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30, 298–304.

35. Fryer, R. G., Jr., Levitt, S. D., List, J., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment (NBER Working Paper No. 18237). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18237

36. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 1–17.

37. Meeker, D., Linder, J. A., Fox, C. R., Friedberg, M. W., Persell, S. D., Goldstein, N. J., . . . Doctor, J. N. (2015). Behavioral interventions to curtail antibiotic overuse: A multisite randomized trial. Unpublished manuscript, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

38. Meeker, D., Knight, T. K., Friedberg, M. W., Linder, J. A., Goldstein, N. J., Fox, C. R., . . . Doctor, J. N. (2014). Nudging guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174, 425–431.

39. Mullen, K. J., Frank, R. G., & Rosenthal, M. B. (2010). Can you get what you pay for? Pay-for-performance and the quality of healthcare providers. Rand Journal of Economics, 41, 64–91.

40. Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003, November 21). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.

41. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

42. Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T., Oreopoulos, P., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205–1242.

43. Wanskink, B., Painter, J. E., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The office candy dish: Proximity’s influence on estimated and actual consumption. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 871–875.

44. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures (Special Paper No. 23). London, United Kingdom: Office of National Statistics.

45. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (2003). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

46. Steblay, N. K., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Eyewitness identification and the legal system. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 145–162). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

47. Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Education Research, 95, 308–318.

48. Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Gerber, A. S. (2013). Rethinking why people vote: Voting as dynamic social expression. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 91–107). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

49. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2004). A behavioral economics view of poverty. American Economic Review, 94, 419–423.

50. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Times Books.

51. Hausman, J. A. (1993). Contingent valuation: A critical assessment. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

52. Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57–70.

53. Haskins, R., & Margolis, G. (2014). Show me the evidence: Obama’s fight for rigor and results in social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

54. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

55. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.

56. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Leth-Petersen, S., Nielsen, T., & Olsen, T. (2012). Active vs. passive decisions and crowdout in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark (NBER Working Paper No. 18565). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w18565

57. Kahneman, D. (2013). Foreword. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. vii–x). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

58. National Bureau of Economic Research. (n.d.). About the NBER. Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://nber.org/info.html

59. Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the Nudge Unit: How small changes can make a big difference. London, United Kingdom: Allen.

60. Sunstein, C. R. (2013). Simpler: The future of government. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

61. Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164–S187.

62. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2013, March 8). Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science, 339, 1152–1153.

63. Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2008, June 20). The MPG illusion. Science, 320, 1593–1594.

64. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.

65. Cuddy, A. J. C., Doherty, K. T., & Bos, M. W. (2012). OPOWER: Increasing energy efficiency through normative influence. Part A (Harvard Business Review Case Study No. 9-911-061). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

66. Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, 104, 3003–3037.

67. Opower. (2015). Opower surpasses 400 billion meter reads worldwide [Press release]. Retrieved from http://investor.opower.com/company/investors/press-releases/press-release-details/2015/Opower-Surpasses-400-Billion-Meter-Reads-Worldwide/default.aspx

68. Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation, Childress, J. F., & Liverman, C. T. (Eds.). (2006). Organ donation: Opportunities for action. New York, NY: National Academies Press.

69. August, J. G. (2013). Modern models of organ donation: Challenging increases of federal power to save lives. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 40, 339–422.

70. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report. Retrieved from http://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2012/Default.aspx

71. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

72. Shah, A. M., & Wolford, G. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science, 18, 369–370.

73. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 5–6.

74. Small, A. M. (1990). Foreword. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. v–vi). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

75. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.